Print

Protect NIH Research Funding – Reject the Indirect Cost Cap 

 

On Feb. 7, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) announced a new policy capping funding of indirect costs at 15%. This policy took effect on Feb. 10 and applies to all current and future grants. 

NIH research grants cover both direct costs (funding for experiments, materials, and personnel) and indirect costs (ICs), which support essential infrastructure, such as lab maintenance, equipment, administrative support, and compliance. These are critical to keeping research institutions running. 

Previously, NIH grants followed a negotiated IC rate, typically between 27 - 28%, though some institutions had rates exceeding 50%. In FY 2023, NIH allocated: 

  • $35 billion for nearly 50,000 grants, supporting over 300,000 researchers at 2,500+ institutions nationwide. 

  • $26 billion for direct research costs. 

  • $9 billion for overhead (i.e., ICs). 

NIH claims this action will save over $4 billion annually, arguing that private foundations fund research with lower IC rates or none. However, universities often absorb those costs or rely on federal funding to sustain their research infrastructure. This policy shifts the burden to institutions. 

By imposing a 15% IC cap, NIH is cutting essential funding for research institutions that could lead to minimal or a lack of operational support, staff layoffs, lab closures, delays or cancellations of crucial biomedical research projects. The policy threatens lifesaving medical innovations and undermines the infrastructure that supports scientific breakthroughs. 

ARVO is working diligently to oppose this harmful decision by developing coordinated advocacy efforts and applying pressure on Congress to overturn these harmful policies. We are calling on you to use your voice and act now by contacting Congress. This is the most effective measure with many ways to engage with your representatives:  

  • Request an in-person meeting at your congressional office. 

  • Call your representatives using 5calls.org, a nonprofit that makes it easy to reach members of Congress. Visit 5calls to take action. 

  • Email a personal message — use our form letter and customize it with your concerns. 

  • Submit a letter — send our pre-drafted message to Congress and urge them to intervene. Submit here.  

You can look up your elected officials' contact information (e.g., address, phone number, website, social media handles) here.

You can also help spread the word via social media and garner support within eye and vision research and biomedical communities.

Use this sample social media post:  

The NIH's proposal to cap indirect rates at 15% on research projects will drastically impact our work. I urge you to make a statement asking the Administration to rescind this order immediately to protect medical science and ensure medical progress continues. #SaveNIHResearch

Lastly, start a conversation with your friends, family and others about how this proposal does not affect just you, but the entire scientific and medical field, and in turn our communities. Many do not understand what indirect costs are/cover and their importance. Educating others is a powerful form of advocacy to help them see the bigger picture.

If you participate in other advocacy activities, we welcome you sharing your experiences with us. Tag ARVO (@ARVOinfo) on social media or email us at outreach@arvo.org.

Stay informed about this policy and ARVO's ongoing efforts to oppose it — updates will be posted here regularly. You can also subscribe to Insight and set up alerts from the ARVOConnect Open Forum to receive the latest news from ARVO and the eye/vision community. 

Resources

NIH Community Sign-On Letter
ARVO joined 600 organizations and over 3,500 individuals across the nation in sending a letter to the leaders of the House and Senate Appropriations Committees in support of the NIH. 

Judge extends temporary block to huge cuts in National Institutes of Health research funding
On Feb. 21, another federal judge extended the block against the Administration's cuts on medical research funding. Thus far, 22 states have filed a lawsuit against the NIH. 

AAMC lawsuit 
On Feb. 11, the Association for American Medical Colleges (AAMC) along with other organizations filed a lawsuit against the Administration leading to a nationwide temporary pause on the proposed indirect costs cap. 

Democratic Senators send letter to HHS Secretary
Multiple Senators sent a letter to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Secretary, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., voicing concerns about the cut to NIH funding.  

Project 2025
Led by The Heritage Foundation, this project is a political initiative to reshape the U.S. federal government in alignment with conservative policies.

Research!America's timeline of Administration actions
Research!America is an alliance of non-profit medical and health research advocacy institutions. They have compiled a timeline of administration actions, tracking policy changes that impact medical and public health research. 

United for Medical Research (UMR)
UMR is a coalition of research institutions, advocates and industry seeking steady and sustainable increases in funding for the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Download their 2024 update on "NIH's Role in Sustaining the U.S. Economy"

USAspending.gov
This is the official website of the U.S. government that provides data on federal spending, such as information about federal grants, contracts and loans. 


Media

For media inquires or to request an interview on this topic, please contact media@arvo.org